Find
AIS sometimes repeats an entry or shows a transaction that belongs to another PAN or year. You can give feedback on the AIS itself and also disagree in the e-Proceedings response. Both steps together give CPC the reason to drop the adjustment.
ITR
AIS entry is wrong or a duplicate: how to disagree
Updated . Every paid answer is checked by a CA. Free AI answers are labelled until a CA verifies them.
Provisions
Sec 143(1)(a) (now Sec 270(2)); Rule 37BA, Income-tax Rules 1962 (now Rule 203)
Analysis
The AIS FAQ allows feedback such as 'information is duplicate' or 'relates to other PAN or year', and some feedback is sent to the reporting entity to confirm. In the e-Proceedings response, choose Disagree for the variance and state that the dividend of, say, ₹12,000 was reported once in Schedule OS and the second AIS line is a duplicate. Keep the company's dividend statement or bank credit ready in case the officer asks. If the payer actually filed wrong data, ask it to correct its statement so the mismatch does not repeat next year.
Close
- Open AIS, find the duplicate line and submit feedback marking it duplicate.
- Note the feedback acknowledgement.
- In e-Proceedings, choose Disagree for that variance and explain briefly.
- Keep the dividend statement and bank credit as proof.
Connect now
A Savvy replies in minutes.
Fixed price before you pay. Your Savvy is paid only after you accept the work.
General guidance from TaxSavvy’s library of money processes. Laws change; your Savvy confirms the answer on your exact case before anything is filed.
People also ask
- Is a proposed adjustment a scrutiny notice
- What a proposed adjustment notice under Sec 143(1)(a) means
- Should I agree or disagree with the proposed adjustment
- Section 270(1) (old 143(1)): Intimation and Demand
- Deadline to reply to a 143(1)(a) proposed adjustment
- Prima facie adjustment notice before the intimation