GST
Does paying through DRC-03 end a fake ITC notice
Updated . Every paid answer is checked by a CA. Free AI answers are labelled until a CA verifies them.
Facts
Paying the full tax, interest and applicable penalty within the allowed time can conclude proceedings. But payment does not cure a defective notice, and paying without advice gives up your defence.
Provisions and law
- Rule 142(2), CGST Rules 2017A person paying tax, interest and penalty voluntarily or after an intimation informs the officer in DRC-03, and an acknowledgement issues in DRC-04.
- Rule 142(3), CGST Rules 2017Where the full amount in the notice is paid within the time allowed, the proceedings are concluded and an order issues in DRC-05.
- Sec 74A(8), CGST Act 2017Under Sec 74A, paying tax and interest before the notice means no penalty in non-fraud cases; in fraud cases a 15 percent penalty is also paid.
Analysis
If you have weak evidence, early payment reduces cost. If you have a genuine defence, paying may not be needed. Where a payment is made against an existing demand, link it using DRC-03A so the liability register shows it. Ask for a DRC-05 order confirming closure after paying the full amount.
Conclusion
- Assess the strength of your evidence first.
- If paying, use DRC-03 and select the right cause.
- Link the payment to the demand through DRC-03A.
- Ask for closure in DRC-05.
A Savvy can do this for you
Reply to fake ITC notice when a supplier is found non-existent, Sec 16(2)(c)
Quote
Get this doneAsk a Savvy on WhatsAppGeneral guidance from TaxSavvy’s library of money processes. Laws change; your Savvy confirms the answer on your exact case before anything is filed.