Startup ecosystem · Incorporation
Sec 68, unexplained cash credit: the startup's hidden tax trap
Updated . Every paid answer is checked by a CA. Free AI answers are labelled until a CA verifies them.
Facts
Sec 68: if a sum is credited to the company's books and the company cannot explain its nature and source, it is treated as income and taxed at 60% + surcharge (effective ~78%). This is the most dangerous section for early-stage startups.
Provisions and law
- IT Act 1961, Sec 68 (now 102) | Sec 56(2)(viib) (now 92) abolished Apr 2025
Analysis
When it applies: Founder brings in ₹5L "personal savings" as capital. No proper documentation of source. IT dept asks, you cannot explain → 78% tax on that ₹5L. Fix: All founder capital contributions must be documented with ITR, bank statements showing source, and a formal subscription agreement. Angel investments need investor's ITR, bank statement, and PAN.
Conclusion
- Investor's PAN, mandatory
- Investor's ITR for at least 2 preceding years (showing capacity to invest)
- Bank statement showing the funds were transferred from investor's known account
- Subscription agreement or share allotment letter
- Board resolution approving allotment
- For founder capital: own ITR + savings bank statement showing source
A Savvy can do this for you
Tech founder money map: salary vs dividend, ESOP, Sec 140 (old 80-IAC), angel round
₹4,999
Get this doneAsk a Savvy on WhatsAppGeneral guidance from TaxSavvy’s library of money processes. Laws change; your Savvy confirms the answer on your exact case before anything is filed.
People also ask
- Foreign crypto exchange: reporting, FEMA, and the Sec 68 trap
- Angel tax abolished: what changed from April 2025
- Penalty on unexplained cash or investments
- Founder Capital Injection: Compliance and Tax Treatment
- Angel Tax: Section 56(2)(viib) and Exemptions
- Explaining large cash deposits in a 142(1) reply