ITR
Intimation demand because TDS was not credited
Updated . Every paid answer is checked by a CA. Free AI answers are labelled until a CA verifies them.
Facts
CPC sometimes processes a return before all TDS shows against your PAN, or matches it under a different section. If the TDS is now visible in Form 26AS and your return claimed it correctly, this is a mistake apparent from record. It can be fixed by an online rectification request.
Provisions and law
- Sec 154 (now Sec 287)Rectification of mistake apparent from record in an intimation or order
- Sec 143(1) (now Sec 270(1))Processing of the return and intimation of tax, refund or demand
- Sec 156 (now Sec 289)Demand raised on processing is a notice of demand
Analysis
Compare the TDS schedule in your return with Form 26AS line by line: TAN, section and amount. If they match, choose Tax Credit Mismatch Correction and correct only the TDS rows. If 26AS shows ₹18,000 under TAN ABCD12345E and CPC allowed ₹0, the demand of ₹18,000 should drop to nil after rectification. If 26AS still does not show the credit, rectification will fail and the deductor must first correct its TDS statement.
Conclusion
- Download the intimation and Form 26AS for the same year and mark the missing TDS rows
- Log in and go to Services > Rectification > New Request, pick the assessment year
- Choose Tax Credit Mismatch Correction and edit the TDS schedule to match 26AS
- Submit with EVC or DSC and note the 15 digit reference number
- Mark the demand as disputed under Response to Outstanding Demand while rectification is pending
Do not file rectification before the credit appears in 26AS; a rejected request blocks a new one until it is closed.
A Savvy can do this for you
Rectification, Sec 154 (now 287)
₹2,499
Get this doneAsk a Savvy on WhatsAppGeneral guidance from TaxSavvy’s library of money processes. Laws change; your Savvy confirms the answer on your exact case before anything is filed.
People also ask
- Demand raised because TDS credit was not given
- Demand in intimation because TDS was not fully allowed
- Section 143(1) (now 270(1)), Intimation after processing: what it means and when it's fine
- Section 270(1) (old 143(1)): Intimation and Demand
- Refund reduced because TDS credit was short
- TDS credit appeared after my return was processed