GST
DRC-01A for ITC from a supplier later cancelled
Updated . Every paid answer is checked by a CA. Free AI answers are labelled until a CA verifies them.
Facts
This is a common ground under Sec 16(2)(c). Your defence is proof that the purchase was genuine, the supplier was active then, and you paid him through bank.
Provisions and law
- Sec 16(2)(c), CGST Act 2017ITC is allowed only if the tax charged has actually been paid to the Government by the supplier.
- Sec 155, CGST Act 2017The person who claims ITC has the burden of proving that the claim is genuine.
- Rule 142(1A), CGST Rules 2017Before a show cause notice, the officer may communicate the tax, interest and penalty ascertained in Part A of DRC-01A; the person may pay or give submissions in Part B.
Analysis
Reply with an invoice-wise evidence table and ask for the material relied on. If the supplier was cancelled retrospectively, show his status at the time of the invoice. If evidence is weak, compare the cost of paying now with the penalty later. See the fake ITC defence process for detail.
Conclusion
- List the invoices from that supplier.
- Collect movement, receipt and payment proof.
- Ask for the material relied on.
- File Part B with evidence, or pay if the case is weak.
A Savvy can do this for you
Pre-show-cause intimation
Quote
Get this doneAsk a Savvy on WhatsAppGeneral guidance from TaxSavvy’s library of money processes. Laws change; your Savvy confirms the answer on your exact case before anything is filed.