Answer

ITR

Both erroneous and prejudicial conditions must be met

Updated . Every paid answer is checked by a CA. Free AI answers are labelled until a CA verifies them.

  1. Facts

    No. The order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. If either condition is missing, revision is not valid.

  2. Provisions and law

    • Sec 263, Income-tax Act 1961 (now Sec 377, Income-tax Act 2025)The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner can revise an assessment order that is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, after giving a hearing, within 2 years from the end of the financial year of the order.
  3. Analysis

    An order can be wrong in a way that does not reduce tax, for example a wrong head of income with the same tax. That is not prejudicial. And an order that reduces tax but follows a legally possible view is not erroneous. Address both conditions in your reply.

  4. Conclusion

    1. Identify the exact error alleged.
    2. Show whether it actually reduced tax.
    3. Show whether the officer's view was legally possible.
    4. Address both conditions in the reply.

A Savvy can do this for you

Revision, Sec 263 (now 377)

₹4,999

Get this doneAsk a Savvy on WhatsApp

General guidance from TaxSavvy’s library of money processes. Laws change; your Savvy confirms the answer on your exact case before anything is filed.

People also ask